Adam Sketchely

• started working 2014, got licence 2017
• first job out of school
• did coop

Hannah Obrien

• from charlottetown, did first year upei
• grad 2019, got job as eit with hrm, as engineering in training rotational
• got permanent position with public works
• i think water treatment?
• her fav courses math and physics, thought she was going to be structural

H: how did u get in to hrm training rotational

• huge application/interview candidate process

Matthew

• engineer in training with hrm
• from windsor, but grew up in ns
• originally did nscc with civil eng tech program, got certified engineer technologist certificate, and then went to uni and got degree
• grad in 2022, been eit for 3 years.
• works in design services with hannah
• why did he choose: loved legos, physics teacher in fam and good pay
• what is civil: jack of all trades
• dont use solid works

Analyze: Discuss an aspect (or aspects) of the panel that you found interesting (or

uninteresting) and explain your reaction.

Evaluate: Assess the panel and identify one personal outcome (a lesson you learned, an

area you now wish to learn more/less about, etc.) from the lecture.

• technical communicating is telling people what they need to know, not writing a lot of fluff (Matthew)
• oeople dont want to read a 30-page report, want nice
• can do qucik calculations, looking at

impirtant things

• learnign to work with others,
• not sitting at a desk dfoing calculaus, all doing everyday is doing talking to other poepls,
• working with cet, talking to people, collaborating
• all those peiple that dont do the part in the group projects still graduate and get jobs, so need to learn how to work with stupid people too.

<aside> <img src="/icons/history_gray.svg" alt="/icons/history_gray.svg" width="40px" /> Summary:

</aside>

INCLUDE EQUITY REFLECTION

Reflection Format Each reflection should be approximately 250 words in length and fulfill the following content requirements:

1. Describe: Identify the guest panelist(s) and the subject of the panel.
2. Analyze: Discuss an aspect (or aspects) of the panel that you found interesting (or uninteresting) and explain your reaction.
3. Evaluate: Assess the panel and identify one personal outcome (a lesson you learned, an area you now wish to learn more/less about, etc.) from the lecture.

Steve Ramsay,

MCA Consultants ; Ben Wright,